Ontario Eyed for Wind Turbine Factory, Thousands of Jobs Possible

Whooee! Well friends an' foes, I been growsin' fer a few years now about how we're missin' the green collar job boat here in Canada -- especially, here in Ontariariario. One question that's been gettin' my goat is howcum we buy our wind generators from Denmark and Germany?

Well, it looks like some smart folks with deep pockets been askin' the same question. Looks promisin', sez I.

Ontario eyed for wind turbine factory
German company considers province for first North American facility, thousands of jobs possible

Jun 19, 2008 10:55 AM

Tyler Hamilton
Energy Reporter

A German maker of offshore wind turbines is targeting southern Ontario as the location for its first North American manufacturing plant, a venture that would create thousands of local jobs and inject hundreds of millions of dollars into the province's struggling economy.

Multibrid, majority owned by French nuclear giant Areva SA, made the announcement this morning alongside officials from Trillium Power Wind Corp., a local renewable-energy developer that plans to build a massive wind farm in Lake Ontario, about 15 kilometres offshore from Prince Edward County.

Trillium, which sees its Lake Ontario project as the beginning of a new industrial strategy for the province and a creator of high-value "green-collar" jobs, has established a wind-turbine buying consortium called Tai Wind committed to placing orders with a manufacturer that locates in Ontario.

"Ontario is perfectly placed to supply North America and even the world with offshore turbines, components, barges, and cranes needed to harness the resource wherever it may be," said John Kourtoff, president and chief executive of Trillium.

"That is the objective of the Tai Wind consortium. We want to build a solid economic foundation to make Ontario a world leader in renewable energy manufacturing and innovation."

Hundreds of megawatts of onshore wind farms have been built around Ontario, but job creation has been limited because the turbines are manufactured from plants in Europe or the United States. Industry experts say there is currently no industrial strategy in Ontario to complement Queen's Park's support for renewable energy development.

A decision by Multibrid to set up shop in Ontario would be welcome relief to a province hammered by the loss of manufacturing jobs, particularly in the automotive and forestry sectors.

Buzz Hargrove, president of the Canadian Auto Workers, backs the initiative and sent a union representative to today's announcement to express his support.

Tai Wind members so far include Trillium and Fishermen's Energy of New Jersey, together representing potential orders for more than 300 offshore wind turbines. Kourtoff said the consortium is open to other North American offshore developers, which face long waiting lists if they rely on turbines to come from Europe.

Meanwhile, Multibrid said it is eager to discuss its role in Ontario with both the provincial and federal governments as it goes through its due diligence.

Compared to onshore wind projects, offshore wind represents only 1 per cent of global deployment. But Emerging Energy Research of Cambridge, Mass., predicts the offshore market is poised to take off and "has reached a critical juncture in its path toward large-scale deployment."

Earlier this month, the U.K. government unveiled an ambitious 12-year plan to deploy up to 7,000 offshore wind turbines in 11 ocean zones surrounding the British coastline - enough to supply electricity to every home in the U.K. when the wind is blowing strong.

Offshore wind projects require special engineering and underwater transmission, making them more expensive to build than onshore projects. But this added cost is largely offset by the stronger, more reliable and energy-packed winds that blow offshore.

In North America there are ocean-based offshore projects proposed off the coasts of New Jersey, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and British Columbia.

But the Great Lakes represent a unique opportunity - they have strong winds, but unlike ocean projects the lake beds are shallower and the water is less turbulent, making for easier construction.

Helimax Energy Inc., in a report recently prepared for the Ontario Power Authority, estimated there are 64 offshore wind sites on the Ontario side of the Great Lakes representing 35,000 megawatts - enough to power all businesses, homes and industry in the province when the wind blows.

Trillium aims to be the first to develop on the Great Lakes. Its Lake Ontario project would likely require an investment of more than a billion dollars and would consist of 150 turbines placed in waters no deeper than 30 metres.

If built, it would be the largest wind project in North America and one of the largest offshore projects in the world.

"It's a significant opportunity that every jurisdiction in the world is looking for," said Kourtoff, adding that Multibrid's interest in locating in Ontario makes it more than just a green power play. "We're saying this is the first step to developing a sustainable, long-term green manufacturing economy."

But Trillium needs to strike a power-purchase agreement with the province for the project to move forward.

The power authority's current position is that offshore projects are too expensive to be part of its 20-year electricity plan.

Over the past decade, or so, Germany has added 200,000 green collar jobs to its economy. Green collar jobs now outnumber auto industry jobs in Germany.

JimBobby

More Free Green Advice for Liberals: Make Lemonade

Whooee! There's an old saying that goes, "When life throws you lemons, make lemonade." It ain't too cryptic. If you get into a situation that looks bad, turn it around by making the best out of it. Right now, the Grits are on the receiving end of a truckload of lemons in the form of a trademark issue regarding the LPC's just-announced Green Shift policy and a private company that has been using that name for a few years. Talk of infringement, cease and desist letters and lawsuits is in the air.

Here are some of the products offered by GreenShift.ca:

• Non-toxic, Biodegradable, cups, plates, bowls, cutlery, bags, wrapping…
• Non-toxic, Biodegradable cleaning products
• Non-toxic, Non Green House Gas emitting fuels
• Fair Trade, Shade Grown, Organic Coffees from around the world
• Chlorine Free, High Post Consumer Recycled Content Paper Products – toilet paper, towels, nose tissues, envelopes… containers.. bags… boxes..

Just the sort of supplies that would come in handy at a summer BBQ. Say... aren't the Liberals planning to promote their Green Shift at scores of BBQs this summer? Wouldn't it be a good idea if those BBQs were as Earth-friendly as possible -- both for the sake of the planet and for the sake of public relations?

Do I need to connect the dots?

I'm involved with my local community hall. We use a fair amount of the types of products offered by Green Shift. I've been advocating that our hall look into using non-toxic, biodegradable, cups, plates, bowls, cutlery and cleaning products. The switchover to green products has been on the back burner, mainly due to my own laziness wrt sourcing this stuff. Thanks to the controversy surrounding the Green Shift moniker, I have a ready source and I'll be pushing for a trial purchase by our community hall.

JimBobby

Get Rid of Your Clothes Dryer... AND Your Clothesline

Whooee! Well friends an' foes, I was just readin' about a new washin' machine that's just comin' on the market over in Merrie Olde Englande. The newfangled outfit uses a cup of water for each load of laundry and the clothes come out dry. No dryer. No clothesline. Hardly any water.

The Three R's are Reduce, Re-use and Recycle. They're listed in order of efficacy. By not needin' a whole appliance, the dryer, we're reducin'. By usin' a paltry cup of water per load, we're reducin'. Clothes dryers are big energy hogs so we're reducin' how much we use. Dryers are big and heavy and get delivered to stores and end-users by truck. We're reducin' the amount of freight on the roads and the amount of fuel bein' burned delivering dryers. These outfits don't use much detergent, neither, so we're reducin' there, too. When we don't use water, we don't need to run used water through sewage treatment plants.

Of course, nuthin's as simple as it might seem. These machines use 40 lbs of plastic chips to pound the clothes clean. After about 6 months, the chips need to be replaced. Unless there's some dang good recyclin' or re-usin' plan for that plastic, the benefits may be outweighed. I reckon it might depend on how easily accessible the water is. In drought-stricken and arid regions, it still sounds like a winner. Maybe they can make the plastic chips from recycled plastic bags or water bottles.

Here's a Reuters article about the (almost) waterless washin' machines.

JB